|
This article appeared in the January February 2003 edition of Wild Ireland magazine -- Ireland's wildlife and environmental magazine. [CJ]
 An adolescent male Sumatran orang-utan swings through what's left of its lush rainforest home in the Gunung Leuser national park, Sumatra, Indonesia. We stopped
and stared. Ninety kilos of muscle, sinew and dense orange fur stared
back.
With a curious mixture of apprehension and wonder we looked on as the
adult male orang-utan apparently decided we were not a threat and
swung his massive bulk into the nearest tree. He proceeded to gorge
on ripe fruit -- the occasional husk tossed in our direction the only
sign he was aware of us at all. This magnificent animal marked the
highlight of our four-night stay in the lush lowland rainforest of
the Kinabatangan River in the Malaysian state of Sabah on the island
of Borneo.
Sungei Kinabatangan, Sabah's longest river, winds its way through the
lowland dipterocarp forest of northeastern Borneo. Piracy and the
risk of flooding have left the lower reaches of the river
comparatively undeveloped, and it still boasts exceptional
biodiversity. A visit to the area is unforgettable for wildlife
enthusiasts, offering the opportunity to experience an incredible
array of plant and animal species in their natural habitat --
including that bizarre-looking Borneo endemic the proboscis monkey,
and of course the orang-utan.
And yet my trip to Borneo haunts me for more disturbing reasons.
Travelling by road in Malaysian Borneo is a sobering experience. Mile
after inexorable mile all you can see is oil palm plantations and
denuded hillsides where forest has been cleared to accommodate yet
more of them. Occasionally you spot a patch of forest thrusting its
canopy above the encroaching palm -- an island besieged on all sides.
You can't help but wonder how long such pockets can survive.
Even along the Kinabatangan, one of the orang-utan's last refuges in
Malaysian Borneo, there is substantial logging activity. We passed
several makeshift logging-camps where timber was being pre-processed,
tied into rafts and floated downriver. When you see even a small a
part of the picture first-hand it is easy to understand how the
orang-utan is in trouble, but the full extent of the devastation man
has inflicted on this gentle ape is truly disturbing.
 An elderly-looking female orang-utan with her baby in Gunung Leuser national park, Sumatra.
The orang-utan (Pongo pygmaeus) is the only species of great
ape found outside Africa, the second largest primate after the
gorilla, and the world's largest arboreal mammal. Once common
throughout Southeast Asia, the great red ape is now confined to the
islands of Borneo and Sumatra. Current figures put the world
population somewhere between 15,000 and 25,000 animals, with about a
third occurring in Sumatra and the rest in Borneo. Some experts
predict that we may see the last wild orang-utan disappear in as
little as a decade.
"The Forest in Kalimantan could disappear in
five years."
}While the
practice of capturing live orang-utans for the pet trade is a factor
in the orang-utan's decline, habitat destruction is by far the
greatest threat. Orang-utan conservation therefore concentrates on
saving Borneo and Sumatra's remaining forests, but the facts paint a
grim picture.
Between 1968 and 2000 Indonesia lost some 40 million hectares of
forest -- more than 5½ times the area of the Republic of
Ireland! An article in The Jakarta Post on 10 December 2001 cites
Indonesian Ministry of the Environment statistics giving an annual
deforestation rate of between 2 and 2.4 million hectares per year.
Longgena Ginting, campaign director with Walhi (the Indonesian Forum
for the Environment) is quoted as saying: "The forest in
Kalimantan, which suffers the fastest depletion, could disappear in
five years". Kalimantan, the Indonesian part of Borneo, is home
to the largest proportion of surviving wild orang-utans.
Orang-utans roam widely in search of food and need large tracts of
uninterrupted forest to survive. Physical barriers, like highlands
and rivers, prevent orang-utan populations from moving between large
areas of potentially suitable habitat. As their forest home is
steadily destroyed populations are forced into ever-decreasing
pockets of isolated habitat that simply cannot support them.
The main sources of habitat destruction are logging and the clearing
of forest for oil palm plantations. Palm oil production in Indonesia
has increased by 57% since 1993, and the country now accounts for 31%
of the world's palm oil production, second only to Malaysia. Global
demand is predicted to rise by a further 50% in the next five years
and some 200,000 to 250,000 hectares of Indonesia's forests are being
cleared each year to make way for new plantations. The widely
publicised forest fires of 1997 and 1998 in Borneo were largely the
result of uncontrolled burning by plantation companies. Some sources
suggest up to 80% of the larger fires were deliberately started in
this way, and eventually destroyed 5 to 10 million hectares of
forest.
So what has this got to do with us?
It is easy,
given such statistics, to point an accusatory finger from afar and
claim the moral high ground. But having obliterated our own forests
in the past are we really in a position to criticise people trying to
eke a living from the land around them? Before we start to point
fingers we should look at the role the international community has
played in funding the atrocities inflicted on Southeast Asia's
forests.
 A young Sumatran orang-utan swings from a branch in Gunung Leuser national park, Sumatra, Indonesia. International financial institutions, many of them from Europe, the
United States and Japan, invested heavily in the pulp and paper
sector in Southeast Asia during the 1990s. That investment fuelled
massive growth in the industry, and production capacity in the region
grew exponentially. Instead of investing the money in sustainable
forest plantations that could be logged in rotation, companies
continued to exploit the "free" timber of the rainforest.
Of the estimated 100 million m³ of wood consumed by the pulp and
paper industry in Indonesia between 1988 and 1999 an estimated 8% was
harvested from sustainable plantations; the remaining 92% was sourced
mainly by clear-cutting rainforest.
But what has all this got to do with us here in Ireland? While
Ireland-specific figures are difficult to come by, it is likely a
proportion of the paper and wood products that we use every day are
ultimately sourced from the forests of Sumatra and Borneo. Check the
packaging of the paper you are using in your office photocopier or
printer, or the writing paper you have in your desk drawer at home.
Chances are that the packaging will not identify the origin of the
timber used to make the paper. The truth is that most of the time we
do not know what we are buying when it comes to paper -- and cheap
paper could quite literally be costing the earth.
According to Friends of the Earth our nearest neighbour, the UK,
imports 20% of the illegally sourced tropical wood entering the EU.
In 1999 5.4 million m³ of illegally sourced Indonesian wood
products entered the UK -- a figure that translates directly to the
illegal felling of around 50,000 hectares of tropical rainforest.
Because of increasing environmental awareness in Europe and the
United States many of Southeast Asia's pulp and paper companies have
developed marketing strategies designed to obscure the origin of
their products on the global market. Many paper products that
originate in Southeast Asia are distributed in the UK un-branded, or
are re-branded by the UK distributors, usually with no indication of
the sustainability of the source or the country of origin. Friends of
the Earth estimate that up to 50% of the UK's wholesale stationary
supply business is contaminated with Indonesian paper sourced
ultimately by clear-cutting rainforest. Some of that paper inevitably
ends up here in Ireland.
 A young Borneo orang-utan lounges near a feeding station at the Sepilok Orangutan Rehabilitation Centre near Sandakan in Sabah, Malaysia. Although these young apes are in the process of returning to the wild, they are still habituated to people and sometimes get very close to visitors. So by buying paper or wood products that do not explicitly identify a
sustainable source, and by buying products containing palm oil (used
in many food products), we are indirectly contributing to the
destruction of the orang-utan's habitat. At the moment the
all-powerful consumers of Western Europe and the United States
continue to be part of the problem, rather than the solution.
How can the situation be improved?
So
what can we do to turn this nightmare around and offer the orang-utan
at least a fighting chance of survival? Dr Gary Shapiro, Vice
President of Orangutan Foundation International (www.orangutan.org),
feels that the biggest challenge facing orang-utan conservation
groups today is coordination and cooperation between the different
parties involved in the conservation effort, and securing adequate
funding to implement creative and innovative projects that can make a
real difference.
"It is important that the various conservation groups support
each other," he said. "The enemy is very clear: greed,
ignorance, poverty and cultural inertia."
Dr Shapiro also wants to see increased funding for
projects that will directly help orang-utan survival, like the Great
Ape Conservation Fund in the USA and the United Nations' Great Ape
Survival Project (GrASP -- www.unep.org/grasp),
and encourages further funding initiatives from the corporate and
philanthropic world.
"Giving people alternative jobs rather than illegal logging,
those that are beneficial or benign to the environment, is key -- and
ensuring that greedy logging bosses do not fill the void with other
poor people is essential," he said, going on to highlight the
need to combat illegal trade through improved enforcement, and for
local education programs -- all of which takes substantial funding.
Dr Cheryl Knott, Assistant professor of Anthropology at Harvard
University has been studying orang-utans in Kalimantan since 1992.
She believes that the biggest threats facing orang-utan conservation
"on-the-ground" in Kalimantan are illegal logging and lack
of law enforcement. Logging is rampant in Kalimantan's national
parks, and local authorities are cashing in by levying taxes on the
illegal timber.
According to Dr Knott the authorities do not even have the support of
the local communities. "Before the regional autonomy, it used to
be just the government, military and police exploiting the natural
resources. Now local business opportunists and villagers are getting
their opportunity to get a cut in what they could only watch get
exploited before."
Simply introducing and enforcing regulations in these areas will not
work. You can not tell a local to stop the work that's feeding his
family so that an orang-utan will be better off. What you can do is
educate local communities about the destructive nature of
indiscriminate logging, teach them about the value of the forest and
of the species it supports, instil in them an understanding of their
role as custodians of this precious resource and, most importantly of
all, provide them with a realistic and demonstrably sustainable
alternative to support their families.
 The ecotourism trade offers some hoipe in that it promotes sustainable and friendly use of the forests and brings money into the local economy
In some areas of Borneo and Sumatra eco-tourism is playing an
important role in providing just such an alternative. Rehabilitation
centres have been established in both Malaysia and Indonesia and work
to reintroduce orphaned and confiscated orang-utans to the wild. Some
of these centres are open to the public, and allow people to get
close to the animals and to learn more about the issues surrounding
orang-utan conservation. These centres provide jobs, attract
international tourists, help fund conservation programmes and inject
both foreign and local currency into the local economy.
Other eco-tourism ventures, like the Borneo Rainforest Lodge in the
Danum Valley Conservation Area, Sabah, specialise in natural history
"experiences". These include guided interpretive nature
treks, marked nature trails and canopy walkways, letting visitors get
up-close and personal with the rainforest in relative comfort. Models
like these are invaluable, as they demonstrate real alternatives to
destroying the forest.
"Eco-tourism shows the population, and the government, that the
orang-utans and the forest provide jobs that will be sustainable.
Nothing is lost by eco-tourism if it's done correctly," said Dr
Shapiro.
When you combine complex local issues, international financial
interests and a global demand for cheap wood and palm oil products
you begin to see the scale of the problem facing conservation groups.
Conservation efforts will need to increase dramatically and become
more effective if they are to reverse the orang-utan's decline.
From Malaysian Borneo there is at least a sliver of positive news. In
March 2002 a survey conducted as part of an environmental impact
assessment for a proposed pulp and paper joint venture found
surprisingly high densities of wild orang-utan. The area, in the
northeast corner of Kalabakan near the Danum Valley in Sabah, was
logged 20-25 years ago, but has shown excellent regeneration since
then. Orang-utans have taken advantage of this good secondary growth
and the survey suggests that the area may now harbour one of the
world's highest densities of orang-utans.
So perhaps, given the opportunity, both the forests of Malaysia and
Indonesia, and the orang-utan populations that they support, can
recover from decades of human abuse. But for that to occur we need to
provide that opportunity -- and at the moment that is just not
happening.
What
can we do to help?
The single
most important thing we can to assist the orang-utan conservation
effort is to boycott any product that could be linked to the
destruction of Southeast Asia's forests.
Professor Birute Galdikas has been studying orang-utans in Borneo
since 1971 and is arguably the world's foremost expert on the
species. As founder and president of Orangutan Foundation
International, Prof Galdikas urges all of us to get involved in the
struggle to save these animals.
"The American and the European consumer are powerhouses,"
she says on the OFI's website, "and if they demand in the
market-place that timber would be labelled with country of origin and
where it actually came from, managed forest or ancient growth forest,
then this would have real repercussions in the real world." She
also stresses that one of the most important things we can do is
write to our political representatives, urging them to support any
initiative that will help protect tropical rainforests throughout the
world.
Dr Shapiro suggests that people in Ireland can
help in other ways too. "Support organisations like OFI and
Orangutan Foundation UK (www.orangutan.org.uk)....
Also participate in eco-tourism programs such as OFI's 11-day
Study-Support-Tour. Support conservation with your feet and your
pocketbook. Together we can make sure that orang-utans will continue
as a species."
Orang-utans are teetering on the brink of extinction, but they are
not gone yet. Given the right circumstances, and plenty of time, wild
orang-utan populations can still recover. Their future, it seems,
like that of so many other species on this planet, is firmly in our
hands.
Things you can do to help
-
Boycott
products likely to have an impact on the world's rainforests (see
Things to avoid).  Screenshot of the Wild Ireland website featuring the article
-
Write
to your TDs and to the Minister for the Environment and urge them to
support initiatives that will help to protect the world's
rainforests.
-
Support
orang-utan conservation groups through financial donations and by
participating in eco-tourism projects that they promote.
Things to avoid
-
Paper -- Only
buy paper products that are clearly labelled showing that they are
from a sustainable source. Raise the issue in your place of work.
-
Tropical Plywood --
Indonesia supplies 90% of the global trade in tropical plywood.
There are currently no sustainable tropical plywood projects in the
country. Consider certified alternative materials instead.
-
Dowels --
These are used as handles for tools (rakes, brooms, mops, etc.) and
are often made from Ramin, a species of tree that grows in the
swamp-forests of Borneo. If there is nothing to indicate the wood is
from a sustainable source consider using plastic or metal handled
tools instead.
-
Rayon --
Indonesia is the world's largest producer of rayon, which is made
from wood pulp. Avoid rayon wherever possible, and choose garments
made of alternatives like cotton, silk or linen.
-
Palm Oil --
Huge tracts of rainforest are cleared to make way for oil palm
plantations in Malaysia and Indonesia. Palm oil is used in many
foods -- check labels carefully and avoid buying products that
contain it.
Useful Websites
|